Fraud, Going Concern, and the Expectation Gap
Consultation has concluded
All parties in the financial reporting ecosystem – which includes management, audit committees, auditors and regulators – have a role to play in addressing fraud and going concern in financial statements.
Although the external audit is only one element within the broader financial reporting ecosystem, the auditor’s role in relation to fraud and going concern in audits of financial statements continues to receive heightened public attention. This is due mainly to an expectation gap between the public’s perception about the role of the auditor and the auditor’s responsibilities in a financial statement audit.
To better understand stakeholder expectations regarding fraudContinue reading
All parties in the financial reporting ecosystem – which includes management, audit committees, auditors and regulators – have a role to play in addressing fraud and going concern in financial statements.
Although the external audit is only one element within the broader financial reporting ecosystem, the auditor’s role in relation to fraud and going concern in audits of financial statements continues to receive heightened public attention. This is due mainly to an expectation gap between the public’s perception about the role of the auditor and the auditor’s responsibilities in a financial statement audit.
To better understand stakeholder expectations regarding fraud and going concern in financial statements, and how they might be addressed, the AASB started information-gathering efforts in collaboration with CPA Canada and various international organizations such as the Association of Certified Chartered Accountants (ACCA).
Of particular focus in our discussions is the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board’s recently published Discussion Paper, Fraud and Going Concern in an Audit of Financial Statements.
Connect with us. We want to hear your views.
The AASB will consider Canadians' comments from information-gathering activities in:
- influencing global initiatives on fraud and going concern, including responding to the IAASB’s Discussion Paper and contributing to joint global research in these areas;
- considering the implications for standards relating to fraud and going concern; and
- working with CPA Canada and others on specific actions that may be needed, including development of non-authoritative guidance in these areas.
We believe we are at critical stage for obtaining views of all stakeholders on these issues. Now is your opportunity to influence the many activities both in Canada and Internationally on this topic.
-
Share Fraud – Additional or enhanced requirements on Facebook Share Fraud – Additional or enhanced requirements on Twitter Share Fraud – Additional or enhanced requirements on Linkedin Email Fraud – Additional or enhanced requirements link
Fraud – Additional or enhanced requirements
about 3 years agoCLOSED: This brainstormer has concluded.Should the auditor have enhanced or additional requirements related to fraud in an audit of financial statements? Share with us your ideas on changes that could be considered.
kdegiobbiover 3 years agoIncrease use of forensic specialists
The auditing standards do not specifically require the use of forensic specialists. However, the auditor may respond to identified risks of material misstatement due to fraud by assigning additional individuals with specialized skills and knowledge, such as forensic and IT experts, to the engagement. The IAASB has asked whether requiring the use of forensic specialists more broadly would narrow the evolution gap. What do you think?
0 comment0kdegiobbiover 3 years agoEnhanced Quality Control requirements
Specific quality control review procedures related to fraud are not explicitly required. However, a material misstatement arising from fraud would likely be considered a significant matter or an area requiring significant judgment and therefore be addressed by the engagement quality control review. In some jurisdictions, like Japan, there are additional quality control review procedures related to fraud. Also, their new fraud standard requires firms to establish policies and procedures that explicitly address the risks of fraud in the elements of the quality control system (i.e., leadership responsibilities for quality within the firm, acceptance and continuance of client relationships and audit engagements, human resources, engagement performance, and monitoring). Should changes like those made in Japan be required more widespread?
0 comment0kdegiobbiover 3 years agoAdditional procedures around non-material fraud
While the auditor is not required to design and perform specific procedures with regard to misstatements that are not material, any misstatement related to fraud that has been identified may be indicative of a bigger issue. The auditor is however required to evaluate whether identified misstatements are indicative of fraud and assess the impact on other aspects of the audit. Do you think auditors need to do more around non-material fraud?
0 comment0kdegiobbiover 3 years agoRequiring a "Suspicious Mindset"
Asking the auditor to be "more skeptical" is not likely to drive a behavioual change. Rather than an approach of "trust, but verify" should the auditor be required to have a suspicious mindset?
0 comment0kdegiobbiover 3 years agoAuditor's responsibilities over third-party fraud
Auditors are required to identify and assess risks of material misstatement due to fraud, design and implement appropriate responses to those risks, and take appropriate action regarding fraud, or suspected fraud, identified during the audit, including material fraud involving third parties. However, it has been highlighted that additional emphasis should be placed on procedures related to identifying third-party fraud. What do you think?
0 comment0 -
Share Going Concern – Additional or enhanced requirements on Facebook Share Going Concern – Additional or enhanced requirements on Twitter Share Going Concern – Additional or enhanced requirements on Linkedin Email Going Concern – Additional or enhanced requirements link
Going Concern – Additional or enhanced requirements
about 3 years agoCLOSED: This brainstormer has concluded.Should the auditor have enhanced or additional requirements related to going concern in an audit of financial statements? Share with us your ideas on changes that could be considered.
kdegiobbiover 3 years agoRevisiting the concept of "material uncertainty" as it relates to going concern.
Reference to a company's ‘ability to continue as a going concern may be interpreted and applied inconsistently, and in some cases, not understood by users of the financial statements. Under some financial reporting frameworks there is no clarity for what has to be disclosed, and therefore there are inconsistencies in the disclosures that are made when a material uncertainty exists. Are the concept of, and requirements related to, a material uncertainty in the auditing standards sufficiently aligned with the requirements in the international accounting standards? Are changes needed?
0 comment0kdegiobbiover 3 years agoLengthening the time period for going concern assessments
Some stakeholders have questioned whether the Going Concern assessment should be extended to cover a longer period. Should this be changed for both management and the Auditor or just one? What time period would be reasonable?
0 comment0kdegiobbiover 3 years agoRevisiting the concept of Going Concern
Certain jurisdictions require management to report on other concepts of the company’s resilience. For example, in the UK, certain entities have a responsibility to report on the entity’s longer-term viability. In Australia, directors declare a statement of solvency, indicating the company can pay all debts as and when they become due and payable. Does the current concept of going concern remain fit for purpose in the current environment? If not, should these other concepts be explored?
0 comment0
Document for Comment
Other helpful documents
Key Date
-
February 01 2021
Who's Listening
-
Phone 416-204-3337 Email kdegiobbi@aasbcanada.ca -
Phone 416-204-3443 Email cng@aasbcanada.ca -
Phone 416-204-3298 Email bgill@aasbcanada.ca