Fraud, Going Concern, and the Expectation Gap

Share Fraud, Going Concern, and the Expectation Gap on Facebook Share Fraud, Going Concern, and the Expectation Gap on Twitter Share Fraud, Going Concern, and the Expectation Gap on Linkedin Email Fraud, Going Concern, and the Expectation Gap link

Consultation has concluded

All parties in the financial reporting ecosystem – which includes management, audit committees, auditors and regulators – have a role to play in addressing fraud and going concern in financial statements.

Although the external audit is only one element within the broader financial reporting ecosystem, the auditor’s role in relation to fraud and going concern in audits of financial statements continues to receive heightened public attention. This is due mainly to an expectation gap between the public’s perception about the role of the auditor and the auditor’s responsibilities in a financial statement audit.

To better understand stakeholder expectations regarding fraud

All parties in the financial reporting ecosystem – which includes management, audit committees, auditors and regulators – have a role to play in addressing fraud and going concern in financial statements.

Although the external audit is only one element within the broader financial reporting ecosystem, the auditor’s role in relation to fraud and going concern in audits of financial statements continues to receive heightened public attention. This is due mainly to an expectation gap between the public’s perception about the role of the auditor and the auditor’s responsibilities in a financial statement audit.

To better understand stakeholder expectations regarding fraud and going concern in financial statements, and how they might be addressed, the AASB started information-gathering efforts in collaboration with CPA Canada and various international organizations such as the Association of Certified Chartered Accountants (ACCA).

Of particular focus in our discussions is the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board’s recently published Discussion Paper, Fraud and Going Concern in an Audit of Financial Statements.

Connect with us. We want to hear your views.

The AASB will consider Canadians' comments from information-gathering activities in:

  • influencing global initiatives on fraud and going concern, including responding to the IAASB’s Discussion Paper and contributing to joint global research in these areas;
  • considering the implications for standards relating to fraud and going concern; and
  • working with CPA Canada and others on specific actions that may be needed, including development of non-authoritative guidance in these areas.

We believe we are at critical stage for obtaining views of all stakeholders on these issues. Now is your opportunity to influence the many activities both in Canada and Internationally on this topic.

Discussions: All (1) Open (0)
  • The Expectation Gap – Finding the root cause

    over 3 years ago
    Share The Expectation Gap – Finding the root cause on Facebook Share The Expectation Gap – Finding the root cause on Twitter Share The Expectation Gap – Finding the root cause on Linkedin Email The Expectation Gap – Finding the root cause link
    CLOSED: This discussion has concluded.

    You need to be signed in to add your comment.

    What do you think is the main cause of the expectation gap as it relates to fraud and going concern in a financial statement audit? What role does everyone in the financial reporting ecosystem have to play and how might these roles need to evolve?


    The ACCA and IAASB have defined the audit expectation gap as follows:

    Audit expectation gap image.


    Copyright © September 2020 by IFAC. All rights reserved. 

    It's critical that all members of the financial reporting ecosystem understand their role in contributing to reducing the expectation gap. The IAASB has outlined the various roles as follows:

    IAASB financial reporting ecosystem


    Copyright © September 2020 by IFAC. All rights reserved.